Skip to main content

Simon of Cyrene

Mark 15.21-32

http://www.msgr.ca/msgr-7/stations_koder_main.htm
Simon was forced to carry the cross

We don’t live in a society where police officers or soldiers routinely order us to do stuff for them.

But Simon did live in such a society. He was the foreigner who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and he got dragged into something that had nothing to do with him.

A man was being taken to his place of execution. He was going to be crucified. He had been severely beaten and he was too weak to carry his own cross. And so they had picked on Simon, possibly because he was black and different (he came from Cyrene, an ancient city in Libya), and they ordered him to carry the cross.

I wonder what he thought as he carried the cross: ‘This thing is heavy. How far have we got to go? Why did I get landed with this? I had my own plans for today. This thing is heavy. It is so unfair. I’m treated worse than a dog in this place. People will think I am the one who is about to be crucified. I can’t refuse. I can’t put it down and run. I am nobody; I am powerless. Are we nearly there yet? This thing is really heavy!’

There are times in life when burdens are imposed on us; when we have to do things we don’t want to do. The child is sick at 3am in the morning and we need to tidy it up; the elderly parent is confused and is getting to the stage when they can’t look after themselves, and we need to step in and make some decisions. Or maybe we are falsely accused, or we are given a responsibility that threatens to crush us. Or our partner falls ill with a long term, disabling, illness and we have got to take on the role of carer. We have a child who is born with a serious disability: all our hopes and plans are blown out of the water. It is not our choice but our life is going to be significantly different. Or someone we love is accused of doing something dreadful (one can only feel deep sympathy both with the families of the victims, but also with the parents of the co-pilot who crashed the German wing plane). Or maybe they tell us we have a life threatening, life changing illness. These are heavy burdens, maybe too heavy a burden, to bear.

But maybe Simon began to also think about the man for whom he was carrying the cross. Perhaps he glanced over at him as he walked beside him. Who is he? What dreadful thing did he do to deserve death by crucifixion?

And maybe when he got to Golgotha he hung around and watched.

He saw this man offered wine and myrrh (it was a sort of sedative) but he refused. He was thrown down on the crossbar and nails were hammered into his wrists. He was then hoisted up, and the crossbar was dropped into a position with a shock that must have torn at his wrists and put every bone in his body out of joint. That was just the beginning.

And then he began to get a hint of what this man was accused of. A written inscription was placed above him: ‘The King of the Jews’. He looked with more interest. A political, no doubt one of those many pretenders who claimed to be the Messiah. And he heard the mockery. There were the passers-by. They were laughing at him, saying that he had claimed that he would destroy the temple and rebuild it in three days.

What was unusual was that men who were considered pillars of the community were also there, senior religious leaders, and they were also having a laugh. They looked at him on the cross and they mocked him for his weakness and his powerlessness. He saved others, they said, but he could not save himself.

And even the two people crucified with him taunted him.

I don’t know what Simon thought. What is interesting is that Mark specifically tells us that this Simon was father to Alexander and Rufus – and Mark would not have mentioned their names if they were not personally known in the early Christian community.

So maybe this Simon did become a believer.

Maybe he came to realise that Jesus, forsaken by everyone, was indeed the King of the Jews, the promised Messiah.

Maybe he came to realise that Jesus chose not to save himself, but rather to go through with the cross in order to save us.

Maybe he came to realise that the temple Jesus was talking about was the temple of his body, and 3 days later the temple was rebuilt, he did rise from the dead.  

And as we read these verses we realise that injustice and bad things happen; we realise that there are times in life when we have to carry very heavy burdens – often burdens that others, or circumstances, have imposed on us. Simon is forced to carry the burden for Jesus, but Jesus is the one who has chosen to take onto himself the burden of burdens. He was falsely accused, spat upon, mocked, beaten and then crucified. He was, as we will see in a few minutes, cut off from God. And he didn’t do it, out of necessity, or for himself. He did it, in love, for us.

And when we find ourselves carrying heavy burdens – whether chosen or imposed, fairly or unfairly - we know that there is one walking beside us, who chose to take onto himself the greatest of burdens, so that as we carry our burden, we discover that he is the one who carries it with us. 

Comments

Most popular posts

Isaiah 49:1-7 What does it mean to be a servant of God?

Isaiah 49:1-7 This passage speaks of two servants. The first servant is Israel, the people of God. The second servant will bring Israel back to God. But then it seems that the second servant is also Israel.  It is complicated! But Christians have understood that this passage is speaking of Jesus. He is both the servant, who called Israel back to God, but he is also Israel itself: he is the embodiment, the fulfilment of Israel In the British constitution the Queen is the head of the State. But she is also, to a degree, the personal embodiment of the state. What the Queen does, at an official level, the UK does. If the Queen greets another head of State, then the UK is greeting that other nation. And if you are a UK citizen then you are, by definition, a subject of Her Majesty. She is the constitutional glue, if this helps, who holds us all together. So she is both the servant of the State, but she is also the embodiment of the State. And Jesus, to a far grea...

The separation of good from evil: Matthew 13.24-30,36-43

Matthew 13.24-30,36-43 We look this morning at a parable Jesus told about the Kingdom on God (Matthew talks of Kingdom of heaven but others speak of it as the Kingdom of God) 1. In this world, good and evil grow together. ‘The one who sows the good seed is the Son of Man; 38the field is the world, and the good seed are the children of the kingdom; the weeds are the children of the evil one, 39and the enemy who sowed them is the devil’ (v37) The Son of Man (Jesus) sows the good seed. In the first story that Jesus tells in Matthew, the seed is the Word of God, and different kinds of people are like the different soils which receive the seed. Here the illustration changes a bit, and we become the seed. There is good seed and there is weed, evil, seed. This story is not explaining why there is evil. It is simply telling us that there is evil and that it was sown by the enemy of God. And it tells us that there is good and there is bad. There are people who have their face turned towards ...

On infant baptism

Children are a gift from God. And as always with God’s gifts to us, they are completely and totally undeserved. You have been given the astonishing gift of Benjamin, and the immense privilege and joy of loving him for God, and of bringing him up for God. Our greatest desire for our children is to see them grow, be happy, secure, to flourish and be fulfilled, to bring blessing to others, to be part of the family of God and to love God. And in baptism you are placing Benjamin full square in the family of God. I know that those of us here differ in our views about infant baptism. The belief and the practice of the Church of England is in line with that of the historic church, but also – at the time of the Reformation – of Calvin and the other so-called ‘magisterial reformers’ (which is also the stance taken in the Westminster confession).  They affirmed, on the basis of their covenantal theology, which sees baptism as a new covenant version of circumcision, of Mark 10:13-16 , and ...