Skip to main content

Jesus Christ, the most cursed man in history


Noel Edmunds tells the story of the time when he was racing, had a crash and was thrown from his car. As he lay on the ground, he exclaimed, 'Jesus Christ'. To which the person running to help him said, 'No, No. Not him. Just one of his faithful followers!'

Jesus' name is possibly the name that is most used by people in this country when they swear. He has certainly surplanted Gordon Bennett. And Gordon Bennett probably never existed: linguists say that the name developed out of a softening of 'My Gawd'. 

But as the article I was reading about Gordon Bennett stated, 'It's not an epitaph one would wish for - to become the physical embodiment of a swear word'.

Several years ago, if people said 'Jesus Christ', they would have been saying the words consciously knowing that it was blasphemy: either because the wanted to look big, or they wanted to shock, or they really did hate Jesus (and maybe the church). You certainly couldn't say them on public TV or radio. But my guess is that most people today don't think twice about saying 'Jesus Christ'. They are not making a statement. It is what you say when something surprising or painful happens.  

But the interesting thing is that, ever since his birth, Jesus has been cursed. 

When he was in conflict with the religious leaders of his society, they challenge him: 'You're demon possessed; you are a Samaritan'

When he hung on the cross - well, listen to this,  
"They crucified two rebels with him, one on his right and one on his left. Those who passed by hurled insults at him, shaking their heads and saying, ‘So! You who are going to destroy the temple and build it in three days, come down from the cross and save yourself!’ In the same way the chief priests and the teachers of the law mocked him among themselves. ‘He saved others,’ they said, ‘but he can’t save himself! Let this Messiah, this king of Israel, come down now from the cross, that we may see and believe.’ Those crucified with him also heaped insults on him."

And within a few years of his death and his resurrection, people were mocking both Jesus and his followers. To choose to follow Jesus was to become a member of one of the most despised groups of people. There is a very famous grafitti probably dating from the early 200's: 'Alexamenos worships his God', showing Christ on the cross with an asses head. 



And amazingly, the bible states 600 years before he was born, in a passage that most people agree is talking about Jesus, that he would be 'despised and rejected, a man of suffering, and familiar with pain. Like one from whom people hide their faces he was despised, and we held him in low esteem'. (Isaiah 53:3)


So why? Why curse Jesus?

And why curse that man if he was such an amazing teacher? He taught things such as 'love your enemies', 'pray for those who persecute you' and 'greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends' - and then says that he will lay down his life for us.

Why curse him if he did such amazing acts of compassion and power: feeding the 5000, healing the sick, even raising 3 people from the dead.

I think that Jesus himself gives the answer.
He says to his followers on one occasion, 'If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world'. [John 15:18f]

The reason that they hated Jesus was because he was different. 

He does not 'belong' to our world. 

I don't mean he was an alien. He was completely human like us.

But his identity did not come from his family, or his tribe, or his religion, or his country. His identity came from his relationship with God. He had this deep conviction that he was the beloved Son of God

He wasn't motivated by the things that other people are motivated by: he wasn't motivated by fear of death, desire for comfort or ease, respect or fame. You couldn't bribe him and you couldn't threaten him. Instead he was driven by a deep love for God, a deep love for the people who God had made, and a desire to do what God wanted him to do. 

And because he was different, he wasn't a member of any religious club or political faction.
In fact he challenged the authority of the religious and political factions of the day.

Their authority rested on their moral achievements. They taught the law of God (or at least their version of it) and they kept the law of God as they taught it. And because of that they were honoured and respected and listened to in society.

But Jesus challenges them:
·        he challenges their hearts (he calls them white washed tombs);
·        he says that they do the public stuff (like praying, giving, ostentatious tithing) without doing the really serious stuff (love, justice and mercy); 
·        he says that they cannot love because they haven't realised how much they depend on mercy (the story of Simon and the woman who washes Jesus feet with her hair); 

He tells them of a God who has not come for the righteous but for the sinner: he tells the story of the shepherd who searches for the one lost sheep; the parable of the Pharisee and tax collector. 

And because Jesus was different, he was free to identify with both the religious authorities, but also with the marginalised, with hookers, terrorists and tax collectors. It is hard to imagine a more explosive mix.

He partied with them. But he didn't become part of their group. 

And Jesus makes some of the most outrageous claims:
·        to forgive sins,
·        to teach with an authority greater than that of the bible - speak the words of God,
·        to be the answer to people's deepest longings and desires.

He says that one day everyone who has ever lived or will ever live needs to stand in front of him and give account of their lives. 
He claims that none of us are going to get to God by our own efforts, none of us is good enough, but that we can get to God if we put our trust in him and receive the forgiveness which he offers.

So perhaps it is not hard to see why people hated him, why they curse him. 

He shakes our convictions
He opens the window to our souls and we see all the rubbish inside. And we realise that we will never be good enough, or clever enough or radical enough to get to God. 
He shows us that deep down we need God, his forgiveness, his guidance and his strength. 

And perhaps, even if people don't mean it, it is not so strange that in our culture which values self-dependence and self-affirmation and self-improvement and self-worth and doing it my way and the freedom to do or to be whatever I want - the one whose name we use as a swear word is the one who taught us that what is needed is dependence on God, that our value lies in God’s love for us and that the best way to live is doing it God's way. 

CURSED BY GOD
Jesus may well be the most cursed man on earth - I can't think of any others who have become the physical embodiment of a swear word.

But what is odd is that the bible tells us that Jesus is cursed not only by human beings but was also cursed by God.

The Old Testament says that anybody who hangs on a tree is cursed: So crucifixion - the nailing and hanging someone to a piece of wood - was not only a most dreadful way to die. It was also a sign that the one who was crucified was under the curse of God.

And one of the first followers of Jesus, a man called Paul, picked up on this when he was thinking about Jesus' death. He said, 'Christ redeemed us from that self-defeating, cursed life by absorbing it completely into himself. Do you remember the Scripture that says, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”? That is what happened when Jesus was nailed to the cross: He became a curse, and at the same time dissolved the curse.' (Galatians 3:13f)

It might sound complicated, but it is quite simple. 

Paul's argument is this. Each of us sins. We do not love as God would have us love. Each of us is therefore under the curse of God.
Jesus did love and he did not sin. He was not under the curse. But, because he loved God and because he loved us, he chose to become the most cursed man on earth in order to take the curse that is ours into and onto himself. 

And he has said that we can find peace and purpose not by working harder to be good or religious (we will never be good enough), not by becoming famous or getting rich or finding human love (it will let us down) - but by coming to him.


The death of Jesus and the curse of God are, of course, not the final word. Having dealt with the curse, God raised Jesus from the dead.

And he is now Lord, and because he freely took the curse onto himself, he has become the source of blessing. 


So I would invite you to call on the name of Jesus Christ, the most cursed man in history

Not JEEESUS CHRIST
To be honest, it is a bit of a risk to use that name as a swear word. We are going to look very foolish on the day of judgement if it turns out to be true. 
But Jesus Christ. 


We are told that all who call on him will be saved: saved from the curse, saved from our sin, saved to begin to live for God, saved to begin to love and to know God and the blessings that he gives. 

Comments

Most popular posts

Isaiah 49:1-7 What does it mean to be a servant of God?

Isaiah 49:1-7 This passage speaks of two servants. The first servant is Israel, the people of God. The second servant will bring Israel back to God. But then it seems that the second servant is also Israel.  It is complicated! But Christians have understood that this passage is speaking of Jesus. He is both the servant, who called Israel back to God, but he is also Israel itself: he is the embodiment, the fulfilment of Israel In the British constitution the Queen is the head of the State. But she is also, to a degree, the personal embodiment of the state. What the Queen does, at an official level, the UK does. If the Queen greets another head of State, then the UK is greeting that other nation. And if you are a UK citizen then you are, by definition, a subject of Her Majesty. She is the constitutional glue, if this helps, who holds us all together. So she is both the servant of the State, but she is also the embodiment of the State. And Jesus, to a far greater

The separation of good from evil: Matthew 13.24-30,36-43

Matthew 13.24-30,36-43 We look this morning at a parable Jesus told about the Kingdom on God (Matthew talks of Kingdom of heaven but others speak of it as the Kingdom of God) 1. In this world, good and evil grow together. ‘The one who sows the good seed is the Son of Man; 38the field is the world, and the good seed are the children of the kingdom; the weeds are the children of the evil one, 39and the enemy who sowed them is the devil’ (v37) The Son of Man (Jesus) sows the good seed. In the first story that Jesus tells in Matthew, the seed is the Word of God, and different kinds of people are like the different soils which receive the seed. Here the illustration changes a bit, and we become the seed. There is good seed and there is weed, evil, seed. This story is not explaining why there is evil. It is simply telling us that there is evil and that it was sown by the enemy of God. And it tells us that there is good and there is bad. There are people who have their face turned towards

On infant baptism

Children are a gift from God. And as always with God’s gifts to us, they are completely and totally undeserved. You have been given the astonishing gift of Benjamin, and the immense privilege and joy of loving him for God, and of bringing him up for God. Our greatest desire for our children is to see them grow, be happy, secure, to flourish and be fulfilled, to bring blessing to others, to be part of the family of God and to love God. And in baptism you are placing Benjamin full square in the family of God. I know that those of us here differ in our views about infant baptism. The belief and the practice of the Church of England is in line with that of the historic church, but also – at the time of the Reformation – of Calvin and the other so-called ‘magisterial reformers’ (which is also the stance taken in the Westminster confession).  They affirmed, on the basis of their covenantal theology, which sees baptism as a new covenant version of circumcision, of Mark 10:13-16 , and part